LISTSERV - VA-HIST Archives - LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	VA-HIST Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Petit confusion
From:	Herbert Barger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:24:29 -0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (35 lines)

The official TJ letter, which I just read today, states it was Adrian
Petit. I am familiar with Hugh Petit being an overseer.

Herb

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Henry Wiencek
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [VA-HIST] Petit confusion


Herb --
It's a different Petit -- Hugh Petit, not Adrian. Check the notes in
Bett's edition of the Farm Book, and the Memorandum Book. Adrian the
Frenchman was not around.

Henry

TJ in a
> letter to Thomas Mann Randolph, Jr, on Feb 29, 1796 (4 months after 
> Harriet I's birth) references Adrian Petit, Mr Page, Mr. Robertson and

> a wedding. This is in the Edgehill Papers. Does this mean that Adrian 
> is STILL awound Monticello?

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US