VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stephan A. Schwartz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:46:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
I have never understood why this seems so complex to people. As a  
widower the relationship of Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson is  
entirely plausible to me. Imagine the emotional impact on Jefferson  
upon seeing what appeared to be a "reincarnation" of his beloved  
Martha  appear in front of him, much as he had first seen her, (Sally  
was Martha's half sister, and reportedly similar in appearance)  
arriving as guardian of "their" daughter when he was in Paris. It  
would, of course, for such a fastidious man, always be a secret  
pleasure, one he would be ashamed to admit. But so very human.

-- Stephan

On 29 Apr 2008, at 23:36, Henry Wiencek wrote:

> Corneliussen, Hardwick, and Herb Barger all mention the possibility  
> that a
> slave with the Jefferson DNA could have fathered Sally Hemings's  
> children
> (possibly the slave named Sandy). I don't think this is likely.  
> Jefferson's
> daughter Martha scrutinized the Farm Book for any scrap of evidence  
> that
> would exonerate her father on the Hemings charge. Had this other  
> Jefferson
> slave existed Martha would certainly have found him and told her  
> children
> about him; Jeff and Ellen Randolph would have pointed the finger at  
> him
> instead of at the Carrs.
>
> I also don't think the "Jefferson uncle" oral history in Eston's  
> line proves
> anything one way or the other. In general, the historical testimony  
> on all
> sides of this issue is a vexing mess--Madison Hemings, the Randolphs,
> Callender, and Edmund Bacon all got some things wrong and some  
> things right.
> The Woodsons are a mystery. And then we have the Fossetts--but  
> that's for
> another time.
>
> As Herb mentions, the McMurrys have tried to knock down the story  
> of Sally
> being the half-sister of Martha Jefferson, but I do not find their  
> argument
> persuasive at all. If that story had originated as a political  
> smear and was
> baseless, as the McMurrys suggest, I think Ellen or Jeff Randolph  
> would have
> brought it up to deny it.
>
> Herb raises an excellent point -- we should try to extract DNA from  
> the
> remains of Madison's son. History would be served, but the family  
> doesn't
> want it done. A pity. It could answer a couple of big questions.
>
> Henry Wiencek
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the  
> instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US