VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Heinegg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:40:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Ray Terry said,
 >I thank you for your dedication and excellent research dedicated to publicizing these overlooked groups of Americans.
 
>I know many of the members of the Nanticoke Indian organization of Millsboro, DE.  They all acknowledge blended heritage and would agree that they are not entirely of Native American descent.  Their desire to create a community based on one facet of their 
ancestry is to be commended, especially for up and coming generations. 
 
>You have chosen to call them 'Free Afican Americans', which is problematical because it assigns them to a continent of origin, uncertain at best.  Except for the few persons identified in early records as 'negro' or 'freed slave' (which in itself is a dicey term vis-a-vis origins) there is in reality no way to separate African from Native American or Mediterrean or from any other source of color: too many instances of changes of color descriptors in any one family over time operate against such a notion.   
 
>I wish you had named your web site 'Free Persons of Color of...' which I believe would be more accurate, but, of course, that is your call.
 
>Overall, nice work!

Thanks for your kind words.
My only problem with the name Free African Americans is that most mixed-race families that were free during the colonial period in the Southeast were culturally white. They spread from Virginia as far as South Carolina and Delaware before a distinct African American culture had developed among slaves. And a culture developed among slaves was irrelevant to mixed-race families who owned land among generally welcoming white neighbors. Many modern-day descendants are considered white, Portuguese, Melungeon, or are named after some Indian tribe.

I found very little evidence of Indian ancestry among the families that settled in Delaware and no evidence to back up the stories of shipwrecked Moorish sailors. (I don't know when the stories about Moors originated--perhaps the twentieth century). 
One family named Sparksman descended from a white woman who had a child by an Indian--perhaps a Nanticoke--in Somerset County, Maryland, in 1712. She lived on the plantation of her master in Somerset County and her grandson Stephen Sparksman was head of a Little Creek Hundred, Kent County, Delaware household of 5 "other free" persons in 1800. There is certainly no evidence that any member of the mixed-race community of Little Creek Hundred, Sussex County, Delaware, ever lived as a Nanticoke Indian. 
Families that descended from people of African ancestry made up nearly all of the mixed-race community in 1800. The communities in Delaware were little different from mixed-race settlements throughout the Southeast and included the Becketts (4 households), Driggers (2 households), Hansors (12 households), Harmons (10 households), and Johnsons--all families from Virginia. 
 Paul

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US