VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Douglas Deal <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:25:12 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (26 lines)
I think that indentured service could sometimes, like apprenticeship, be a
kind of "foster care" (or, very rarely, adoption). The expectation of
labor should, of course, not be forgotten--though it was also present in
biological families.

I would disagree with Jim Watkinson's last assertion that "servants had
little more rights than slaves." Whatever the similarities in their
experiences, fundamental differences of race, status, and rights remained.
Servitude was voluntary, contractual, and temporary; slavery was
involuntary, lifelong, and hereditary. In county courts, servants could
complain about mistreatment or breach of contract (and occasionally get
justice), and they could testify in all manner of cases; slaves could not
complain and could not testify against whites, by and large.


Douglas Deal
Professor of History and Director of General Education
State University of New York at Oswego
Oswego, NY 13126
[log in to unmask]
(315)-312-5631 (voice mail)
(315)-312-3577 (FAX)

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US