VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Frederick Fausz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:54:05 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
Did anyone view the webcast of JAMESTOWN LIVE! yesterday 11/9?

They should have called it "MTV-Chesapeake" because the singing
and dancing sure received more attention than the historical content,
which was rather simplistic, shallow, and bland even for an elementary
and middle school audience.   Emphasizing cultural diversity is admira-
ble and long overdue, of course, but it is wrong to talk about the "culture"
(singular) of Europe (or even Britain), Indian America, or Africa.  Diversity
was the norm on all three continents, not just between continents.

Especially erroneous was the song about the first slaves (sic) who came
from the "African nation" in 1619 and anachronistic mention of the 3/5ths
compromise that early.

The explanation of indentured servitude confused that system of agricultural
labor with "apprenticeship" to craftsmen, as in England.

Chief Adkins didn't even mention that his own Chickahominies were inde-
pendent of Tsenacommacah under "Powhatan," and he expanded that
paramount chief's domain to "35 to 40" tribes, which no scholar could defend.


The "Virginia Company was [NOT] here to stay," and if I heard it right, the
wrong date was given for the Laws Divine, Moral, and Martial.

Aside from two brief references to "occasional warfare" between the Powha-
tans and the English, most of the expert commentators carefully skirted the
issue of prolonged, frequent, and intense intercultural violence.  Such myth-
ical FEELGOODISM and Sanitized history is deceptive. Even young children
should not be lied to, or they'll grow up to be as ignorant and complacent as
Rush Limbaugh, who once talked about the "so-called trail of tears."

Like it or not, the European colonization of America was an exceedingly
violent and disruptive invasion--representing a more universal characteristic

of cultural expansionism and territorial invasion than multiethnic toleration
or "democracy" (can you spell, IRAQ?)  Let's not be hypocritical about our
heritage, since our homesteads and mortgages are grounded in inventions
of the conquering invaders, facilitated by centuries of exploiting Indian
lands
and African labor.  If we hope that history will help explain the present and
give us a glimpse into the future, we must tell the whole story of our
ancestors.  That may not be very popular, but it is at least honest.

Fred Fausz
St. Louis

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US