VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: The Constitution
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:44:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines) 
Mr. Adams--

I am confused by your post.  I was responding to the question
where to find the Habeus Corpus clauses in the Constitution,
and likewise to various misrepresentations of the Court's
finding in Ex Parte Milligan.  I am quite willing to take your
word for it that we can find the sentence you quote
immediately following the Habeus Corpus sentence--but I I
don't understand why you have drawn our attention to it?

I am not trying to pick a fight here--I just don't see the
connection.

All best,
Kevin

---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:30:21 -0600
>From: John Philip Adams <[log in to unmask]>  
>Subject: Re: The Constitution  
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>SAME ARTICLE next line down. 
>"No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
>Why isn't everyone paying attention to this, especially as it
relates to so
>many Tax matters.
>JPAdams
Kevin R. Hardwick, Ph.D.
Department of History
James Madison University

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US