VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hannah Powell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:04:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
"Slave Schedules" on the census were about the slaves owned by a head of 
household.  Quite often the only ones he or she owned were the household 
slaves.  Many times they did not own male slaves for the household.  Slaves 
for the labor on roads and fields ..etc... were rented from the State 
Government from it's inventory of slaves.   There were State Owned and 
County Owned slaves as well as those owned by a household.
Hannah Powell

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Craig Kilby" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] slaves


> Phebe:
>
> That is an unusual situation and one I've never encountered as a 
> consistent pattern among a diverse set of slave owners. As you know,  the 
> names of the slaves are not given on these schedules. (This had  been a 
> lively debate in Congress when passing the first slave  schedule act.) 
> Another good source for you to check are inventories  of estates which 
> will provide names, in some cases even surnames, and  in some cases 
> relationships. While a will may have named certain  slaves, more often 
> than not there were several more not named.  For  other details, study the 
> accounts of an estate to see who was sold,  hired out or otherwise 
> inherited by descendants. There are lots of  goodies in those records 
> concerning slaves.  On a slightly unrelated  topic, a recent survey we 
> made for estate records in Lancaster County  revealed that only 37.5% of 
> decedents died leaving a will. In nearly  every case where a person died 
> with a will and named slaves, there  were other slaves not named at all in 
> the will.
>
> Craig Kilby
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Phebe wrote:
>
>> There are several folks on this list that have a great knowledge  about 
>> slavery.  So I am asking if we could in a civil manner just  answer one 
>> question.
>>
>> In looking at the 1850 and 1860 slave census I noticed that several 
>> owners did not list the men.  Rather they just listed young  children 
>> male and female and older women.
>>
>> Now men had to be around as children are born to women at a regular 
>> interval.
>>
>> Thoughts please..............
>>
>> Phebe Morgan
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ______________________________________
>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the  instructions 
>> at
>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions 
> at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html 

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US