VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Gilmore <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 06:46:13 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Well put, Kevin.  I would only add that "group think" is so easy to
recognize in Them, and so hard to see in Us.
--Tom Gilmore

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:46 PM, <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> Political Correctness is a bad thing.  But you would be simply incorrect to
> think that it applies uniformly across all academic conversations.
>  Academics, just like everyone else, are prone to divide themselves along
> political lines.
>
> There is as much "group think" and proclivity to knee jerk moral judgments
> among right wing academics as there is among left.  Its ugly whenever it
> happens.  But human nature being what it is, it is something in which
> persons from all political persuasions are quite capable of indulging.
>
> All best,
> Kevin
>
> ---- Original message ----
> >Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:27:52 -0400
> >From: Herbert Barger <[log in to unmask]>
> >Subject: Re: What is the current defination of "revisionist history"?
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >I don't believe it is such a hard task to identify that which attempts
> >to revise history to one's own agenda and throw in political correctness
> >for good measure and we have it pretty well "nailed down."  The term is
> >quiet frequently used in identifying persons who traffic in this
> >trade.........look around......see or read of any?
> >
> >Herb
> >
> >I think that, save when used as a term of art in discourse between
> >professional historiographers and historians, the term "revisionist" is
> >pejorative.  That is to say, it is used to disparage the work of
> >scholars with whom one happens to disagree.
> >
> >My comment here is quite subjective.  This is just an impression, and
> >hence not a comment I wish to advance with any special claim to
> >authority.
> >
> >All best,
> >Kevin
> >Kevin R. Hardwick, Ph.D.
> >Department of History
> >James Madison University
> >
> >______________________________________
> >To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
> at
> >http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> Kevin R. Hardwick, Ph.D.
> Department of History
> James Madison University
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US