VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Martha Katz-Hyman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 13:59:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (109 lines)
Barbara,

Thanks for the clarification. The last date for the guardian accounts is
1778, with no specific month and day. And the years 1775-1778 were
presented all at one time, in 1778. And the accounts do list the slaves
that were allotted to Edward in 1772 at the slave division. I have to do
more research on Ann and find out if there is a record of her marriage.

As for the will, it specifically leaves "all my Land & all its Purenants
there so belonging" to the oldest son, John, then to Edward, and then to
Ann (if John and then Edward die without a lawful heir). Should all 3 die
with a lawful heir, then the land goes to his brother, William. The slaves
are left in the care of the executor (William) until "either one of my
children come to lawful Age or Married and then to be equally divided...."

It was this wording that made me think that James's wife was dead.

Thanks again.

Martha Katz-Hyman
Curator
Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation
Williamsburg, VA

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Barbara Vines Little <[log in to unmask]
> wrote:

> The age of majority for males and females was 21. However, a father could
> establish a different age if he so chose.
> You cannot assume anything. The court could have allowed the division
> because the married daughter's husband petitioned for her share. The share
> of an underage child would have been placed with the guardian, who guarded
> not the child but the property.
> The wife did not have to be named in the will. She automatically received
> her dower portions--one third of any real estate for life and at least a
> child's part of the personal property.
>
> The guardian accounts probably provide the best clue. What was the date of
> the last item in the accounts? Since the guardianship ended when the child
> came of age, this should provide some help in establishing that date,
> unless there were later accounts that do not survive.
>
> Barbara Vines Little, CG, FNGS, FVGS
> PO Box 1273
> Orange, VA 22960
>
> 540-832-3473
> [log in to unmask]
>
> CG, Certified Genealogist, is a service mark of the Board for
> Certification of Genealogists, used
> under license by board-certified genealogists after periodic evaluation;
> the board name is
> registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office.
>
>
> On 10/9/2014 11:57 AM, Martha Katz-Hyman wrote:
>
>> In connection with research I am doing for the new museum that will
>> replace
>> the Yorktown Victory Center, I am investigating the life of Edward Moss,
>> one of the members of the very large Moss family of York County.
>>
>> This Edward Moss (there were many of that name!) was the son of James Moss
>> (son of William Moss & Elizabeth Goodwin) and an unknown wife who
>> evidently
>> predeceased him (no wife is named in his will). James died in 1762 leaving
>> 3 children (John, Edward and Ann/Anna) all under the age of 21. James's
>> estate appears not to have been finally settled until December 1772, when
>> 16 slaves were divided among the three children (not all of the slaves
>> named in the inventory are included in the division). By 1772 John was no
>> longer an "orphan" and Ann was married, but I am assuming that this is the
>> year that Edward also reached his majority.
>>
>> My questions:
>>
>> 1) What was the age of majority in Virginia for both genders in the third
>> quarter of the eighteenth century?
>> 2) Am I correct in assuming that the slaves were not divided until 1772
>> because before that date Edward was still an "orphan"?
>> 3) There are records in the York County Guardians Accounts from 1773-1775
>> for the expenses Thomas Smith incurred as guardian of Edward Moss. Was
>> Edward Moss still an "orphan" or are these accounts (recorded in 1774 &
>> 1775) "after the fact" accountings that Thomas Smith presented to the
>> court?
>>
>> Thanks for your help in figuring this out!!
>>
>> Martha Katz-Hyman
>> Curator
>> Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation
>> Williamsburg, VA
>>
>> ______________________________________
>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
>> at
>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US