VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Richard E. Dixon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Mar 2002 21:03:18 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
In a message dated 3/30/2002 3:22:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> the opinion of several contemporary county prosecutors from Maryland and
>  Virginia, certainly strong enough to meet in practice the legal standard
>  "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Professor Hardwick:
And as I responded privately, "I know an expert, blah, blah.." is not an
analysis or even an argument. Proof of paternity is no longer an issue of
"circumstantial evidence," and with the DNA only implicating the Jefferson
line to Eston Hemings and not Thomas Jefferson alone, and without the mother,
your "prosecutors" need more than Gordon-Reed's book, which by the way, only
proposes a probability, not a conclusion "beyond a reasonable doubt."
But you are right, all academics are not in the same barrel. The group that
comprised the Scholars Commission, some of the most distinguished in
Jefferson and colonial history, issued a report that it is unlikely that
Jefferson was the father of Eston Hemings.
 ____________________________________________________________________
Richard E. Dixon
Attorney at Law
4122 Leonard Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030
703-691-0770 fax 703-691-0978
____________________________________________________________________

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US