VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"w. cary anderson" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:07:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
This is a most fascinating subject being discussed.  There certainly appears
to be much food for thought.  I find the statistics interesting as well as
the offered reasons why so few children.  Infant mortality must have been
extremely high due to any number of conditions.  I certianly hope an article
is being considered.  It is a worthy subject.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Netti Schreiner-Yantis" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: Children in 1624/5 Muster


> Kathleen --
>
> I am pleased to have this reference.  The Muster did not give the ages of
> these girls, but I wondered if perhaps some of them had been born before
> 1615--now I know.  Thanks.
>
> I also want to thank all the others who have answered my query.  Stephen,
I
> was able to use the second address you gave me to Medline and found a
number
> of very interesting articles as a result.
>
> And, OOPS, I found two other children who could also have been born by
1615
> in Virginia--since the Muster does not give a ship for them.  One, Mara
Buck
> who was listed as age 13, definitely was born in Virginia.  Dorman's ADV
OF
> PURSE & PERSON gives an excellent biography of the family (which I just
read
> after discovering I had made a mistake in saying none of the children over
> age 10 who were listed in the 1624/5 Muster had been born in Virginia.)
By
> the way, I have no doubt someone on this list caught my error and didn't
> tell me because they thought I would be offended.  If that is so, please
be
> assured that I WANT to know if I have made any mistakes!
>
> The other possible native of Virginia (whose age was recorded in the
Muster)
> was John Tree who was 12 years of age and was living with his father
Richard
> on James Island.  According to the Muster, Richard came in the George
(year
> not given); no ship is mentioned for his son John.  A patent to Richard
Tree
> for 50 acres, 14 Aug 1624, states that Richard was a "Carpenter, of James
> City, who came to this country with Master Abraham Percye, Cape Merchant,
in
> the George, as a free man." [Patent Bk 1, pt. 1, p. 19.] Again using ADV
OF
> PURSE & PERSON as a reference, it states on page 478 that Abraham Peirsey
> first came to Virginia in 1616 in the Susan, then returned to England and
> "the following year came back to Virginia . . .  on the second magazine
> ship, the George."  So it appears that Richard Tree came in 1617, and, if
> that was the case, his tweleve-year-old son was born in England and came
> over later.
>
> Netti
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US