VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:21:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
David,

Your version of the story sounds much more plausible than the laundered 
version typically included in textbooks.  The term "massacre" conjures up 
images of large numbers of victims, and that was the purpose of so naming 
it. But it did not reflect the reality of what happened any more than 
referring to Nat Turner's misguided rebellion as "genocide" because he only 
killed white folks. The real "genocide" was the institution of slavery 
itself, in which slaves were worked to death and then replaced with more 
unwilling bodies shipped from Africa.

Anne

Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]
http://www.erols.com/apembert
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org 

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US