Mr. Tarter, does this cover only those who want to re-argue the 
paternity question in futile, tedious efforts to persuade their 
unpersuadable opponents, or does it _also_ apply more widely to those of 
us who are not trying to do that, but who do believe that we see 
legitimate other dimensions of Hemings-TJ that warrant discussion? I 
hope it's not a baby-and-bathwater thing, in other words. In any case, I 
hope I may complete and distribute my response to Mr. Kukla's generously 
offered second message about the historiographical dimension that I 
engage, the authority of science in the Hemings-TJ debate. Thanks.
Steve Corneliussen

>  
>

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html