VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stephan A. Schwartz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:38:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
I believe you have what is known as Muntz metal. a non-rusting  
amalgam of zinc Å40% and copper Å60 per cent.  It was used as a  
cheaper non-rusting option for ships Try this: http://www.intota.com/ 
multisearch.asp?strSearchType=all&strQuery=muntz+metal

-- Stephan

On 20 Jun 2007, at 00:44, Barrett Decker wrote:

> Hi- I have a question that I have wondered about for a long time.  
> Perhaps one of the "ironmasters" has the answer. I have run across  
> a type of grey metal produced between 1780-1850  that seems to be  
> rust proof- one item, a firming chisel lost prior to the WBTS and  
> found about a hundred years later in a rubble stone wall where it  
> had fallen between two of the rocks with no apparent rust, the  
> other, the large ringbolts in the stones above the last lock on the  
> downstream end of the Va canal around Great Falls that were used to  
> anchor stabilizing ropes down to the boat in the lock as it  
> descended to the river level- also rust free since 1790- the  
> mention of titanium in the ore from the Albemarle IW got me  
> thinking about it- any thoughts? Thanks-Barrett
>
> Barrett  Decker   [log in to unmask]
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Brothers" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 4:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] Augustine Washington Seniors Will (George  
> Washington & Iron Works).
>
>
>> Never said that George Washington didn't own an interest in iron   
>> works. He did. As I have stated he was a part (1/12) owner in the   
>> Principio Co. But with the exception of the Potomac (Accokeek) IW  
>> and  associated mine (which were closed in the 1750s) all of the  
>> Principio  holdings were in Maryland.
>>
>> Due to the laws governing ore in the Northern Neck, 1/3 of all  
>> ore  mined was owed to the Proprietor. A number of ironmasters and  
>> owners  (including Augustine Washington and John Tayloe), claiming  
>> that the  ore in Virginia was not good, asked for and got  
>> permission to import  Maryland ore tax free. As this "poor"  
>> quality ore had been  successfully used by Neabsco, Bristol.  
>> Occoquan, Grimes' Recover,  Chiswell, Fredericksville, Marlboro,  
>> and Tubal(and came from a  variety of deposits) it seems more  
>> likely that it was an economic  issue and not one of quality.  
>> Modern analysis of Virginia iron ore  has not revealed any  
>> problems, except for high quantities of titanium  in the ore used  
>> by the Albemarle IW.
>>
>> The "iron mines" of the day were open pit and often, per A  
>> Progress  to the Mines, required blasting. It was not all heavy  
>> manual labor.
>>
>> James Brothers, RPA
>> [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US