Nope, two totally different animals. I would, however, have an issue with "Cardwell History Month," and organizations aimed at forcing society as a whole to discriminate on behalf of descendants of Catholic recusants.
Sunshine49 <[log in to unmask]> wrote: So I guess my looking at the circumstances of Thomas Cardwell's life
and his family being Catholic recusants, a relative who was hung,
drawn and quartered by the Crown because he was a priest, and why
Thomas came to Virginia, the life of an indentured servant, is
beating a dead horse? The Crown no longer executes Catholics, English
can emigrate to America like anyone else, there are no more
indentured servants, maybe I should just get over it. Maybe I'm just
trying to keep those old wounds alive. Or does one assume that
looking into one's slave ancestry must mean a demand for sympathy,
apologies, reparations? The article I posted said that nowhere- it
was an interesting look back into the history and descendants of a
group of people, that's all. I see nothing at all objectionable in that.
Nancy
-------
I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days.
--Daniel Boone
On Feb 12, 2007, at 5:31 AM, Clara Callahan wrote:
> Hopefully at least 90% of it is history. I understand what the man
> is saying and it has nothing to do with racism or white people who
> think only they are or have a right to be interested in their own
> history. What comes to mind is that old saying about beating a
> dead horse while miraculously keeping it alive by using it to
> garner sympathy and special treatment hundreds of years after the
> fact. He may not have said it as politically correctly as some
> would like, but his view has as much validity as any other view
> here. Furthermore, one thing he is NOT doing is rewriting history
> as in painting savages who murder and mutilate as wholesome and
> respectable, which brings to mind another old saying about making a
> silk purse from a sow's ear.
>
> Sunshine49 wrote: It's history. If all
> history is to be "gotten over", why are we even
> in this group? Why do any one of us read any record or account, or
> write any book or paper? Let's just burn it all, it's over, forget
> about it.
>
> Why are YOU in this group? Or are only white people allowed to have
> an interest in their history?
>
> Geez, lighten up...
>
> Nancy
>
> -------
> I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days.
>
> --Daniel Boone
>
>
>
> On Feb 11, 2007, at 9:30 PM, Basil Forest wrote:
>
>> Get over it. Slavery has been dead since the 13th amendment in 1865.
>>
>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
>> instructions
>> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
> instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
> instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
