VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Kiracofe <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:45:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Anne:  

I think your essay is overall accurate in details, but as some other commentators have noted, a bit simplified in depicting Turner's character.   One thing that you should definitely edit is this sentence: "Nat Turner learned that God had a mission for his life."  This was Turner's belief (or delusion?), but it is entirely unprovable that God had any such plan that Turner could "learn" of -- either of the wanton violence or even of Turner as an agent of ending slavery.   If you however will indicate that this was simply Turner's belief, then you can perhaps satisfy some of the critics who claim you are explaining away Turner's violence.   It was his belief, and thus his actions -- give Turner the "ownership" of those murders (the ones he directly committed and those he called others to commit) for which he was, and still can be, held responsible.   Placing the crimes in the context of slavery's social and relational complexities should not allowed to appear a justification.

David Kiracofe



David Kiracofe
History
Tidewater Community College
Chesapeake Campus
1428 Cedar Road
Chesapeake, Virginia 23322
757-822-5136

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US