VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Craig Kilby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 23:56:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Lyle--tax lists can be confusing.  Speaking only slightly off the  
cuff, there are 3 columns:  Land valued as vacant land, land value  
per acre with improvements (rather meaningless, but where you may be  
running afoul), then total value of improvements.

Craig Kilby

On Oct 3, 2008, at 10:14 PM, Lyle E. Browning wrote:

> Virginia law required the listing of building values as a separate  
> entity after 1820, although 1819 was the year that some counties  
> started the practice. What I have noted is that prior to building  
> enumeration, land value for the same parcel was higher than when  
> buildings were listed.
>
> Is the decrease in value of the land because the bite of the tax  
> was added for buildings or because there was an unofficial value  
> for buildings prior to separate listing? One I was looking at had  
> $3000 for land value prior to buildings listed and $1000 after with  
> no indication of cause as would be normal.
>
> Any thoughts gratefully received.
>
> Lyle Browning, RPA
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the  
> instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US