VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Kukla <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:54:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
This tem was posted on the History News Network - from original at
Common-Place.org...........


Henry Wiencek: Interviewed about his book on George Washington
        Source: Common-Place.org (7-1-06)

Henry Wiencek is the author of the acclaimed An Imperfect God: George
Washington, His Slaves, and the Creation of America (2003), winner of the
Los Angeles Times Book Prize in history and the Best Book of 2003 award
from the Society for Historians of the Early American Republic.

Common-place: One of the striking revelations in Imperfect God is just how
intertwined Washington's life was with the institution of slavery.
Everyone knows he owned slaves, but few recognize just how pervasive a
part of his day-to-day existence slaves and slavery were. Was this a
revelation to you as well? If so, how did it come about?

Henry Wiencek: Because Washington is chiefly known and studied as a
political figure, historians have looked at Washington's encounter with
slavery through a political lens. Finding that Washington made no official
statements about slavery during his presidency and that the issue did not
arise in any dramatically significant way during his term, the political
historians have relegated slavery to a footnote in studies of Washington.
The story is almost the same for Washington as a military leader. General
biographers of Washington have by and large been uninterested in slavery
(Flexner is somewhat of an exception), except as a narrative device for
making Washington look good; so they have tended to cherry pick anecdotes
and statements that put Washington in a positive light, and they have
tended to compartmentalize the discussion in a single, brief section or
chapter. Reading these books would make one think that slavery was present
in Washington's life only as a kind of social/environmental
wallpaper—African American figures hovering silently in the background in
dining rooms and in fields—and that slavery never ruffled his Olympian
conscience at all.

Because I came at Washington from the perspective of someone who studies
plantation families, I knew before I had even begun that I would find
slavery a pervasive presence in Washington's life. How could it be
otherwise? Before he was anything else he was a planter/farmer (two
different things), and if you asked him while he was in office what his
occupation was, he would have said "farmer." He inherited slaves when he
was still a child; he bought, sold, and rented slaves; he personally
managed slaves, depended on slaves for his income for his entire life,
negotiated with individual slaves, personally chose certain slaves for his
household and for public appearances, and entered contracts regarding
slaves; he married a woman whose wealth consisted very largely of slaves
and who controlled more slaves than he did; he directly felt the effects
of local and federal laws regarding slaves, etc., etc. Having slaves
around all the time was part of his psychology—it was comforting; it
validated his status as a person of substance and authority. There was no
doubt at all that slavery pervaded his life, but the question was:
ubiquitous or not, did slaves and slavery stand far in the background of
his consciousness (as wallpaper), or did he have some direct, pressing
awareness of moral and ethical issues regarding slavery? We look back and
say slavery was evil by our standards; maybe he didn't feel that way at
all. I was acutely aware of the problem of "presentism"—judging a figure
of the distant past by our standards. I wanted to discover what
Washington's own standards were, and my starting point was his last will
and testament, in which he freed his slaves. In parsing the language of
his will I found that, by the last year of his life, slavery had become a
huge moral issue for him. Did this represent a change in his thinking? If
so, what brought about that change? When? The will also suggested that
Washington sharply disagreed with his wife and the rest of his extended
family on the slavery issue....

Posted on Friday, July 7, 2006



Dr. Jon Kukla, Executive Vice-President
Red Hill - The Patrick Henry National Memorial
1250 Red Hill Road
Brookneal, Virginia 24528
www.redhill.org

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US