VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Herbert Barger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:27:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
I don't believe it is such a hard task to identify that which attempts
to revise history to one's own agenda and throw in political correctness
for good measure and we have it pretty well "nailed down."  The term is
quiet frequently used in identifying persons who traffic in this
trade.........look around......see or read of any?  

Herb

I think that, save when used as a term of art in discourse between
professional historiographers and historians, the term "revisionist" is
pejorative.  That is to say, it is used to disparage the work of
scholars with whom one happens to disagree.

My comment here is quite subjective.  This is just an impression, and
hence not a comment I wish to advance with any special claim to
authority.

All best,
Kevin
Kevin R. Hardwick, Ph.D.
Department of History
James Madison University

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US