To the English he was a National hero. To the Sapnish he was the Jesse James
of the day. It is all a matter of whose ox is getting gored. The Indians
were just wanting to figure out to get rid of all of them.
JPAdams
Texas
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf of Anne Pemberton
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 7:06 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Pirates and Privateers
John,
I'm not sure that thieving from a thief is an honorable undertaking. After
All, Drake did not return those "riches" to the native people, but just
Passed them on to other people who didn't deserve them either.
Anne
Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]
http://www.erols.com/apembert
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Philip Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: Pirates and Privateers
> Drake is considered a war hero and explorer in England. What he did was to
> fight against a Spanish force that at the time was oppressing, stealing
> the
> gold, silver, and other resources, of the indigenous natives, Aztecs and
> Incas. So who is the more guilty party? Drake circumnavigated the planet
> while the Spanish were busy trying to pillage the resources. Drake was
> knighted for this exploit and also for his efforts, his uncle's Sir John
> Hawkins and the rest of the English Admirality in 1588. Beating the
> Spanish
> and saving the world from the Inqusition of Torqueamda and the Spanish
> Catholic Church shold also receive a little mention.
> John Philip Adams
> Texas
>
> On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Sharon Peery wrote:
>
>> This strikes me as anachronistic. Sir Francis Drake was
>> a pirate too, you know. One of the ways early govern-
>> ments dealt with insufficient funds to create an adequate
>> navy was to issue letters of marque and to set the whole
>> thing up as a free enterprise. (With the entire private
>> contractors presently operating in Iraq, we seem to be returning to
>> that era.)
>>
>> As for Nat Turner, Gabriel etc., just how were slaves
>> who objected to slavery supposed to respond? There
>> were certainly no legal routes for them to pursue, and
>> they sometimes responded with what seems to us
>> "mindless violence," in the great tradition of the European peasant
>> uprisings. I too am a fan of Douglas
>> Egerton's book on Gabriel's rebellion, and it should be
>> noted that Mr. Egerton contends that Gabriel was very
>> much influenced by the rhetoric of the Jeffersonian
>> party around the 1800 elections.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne Pemberton" <[log in to unmask]
>> >
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 1:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] Nat Turner Rebellion
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
> at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
> at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
