VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Dixon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:10:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (219 lines)
O.K., Robert Carter is a great example. Paul Finkelman says Ben Franklin,
but I would like to see how many slaves and under what circumstances. I
don't think James Madison and James Monroe meet the test which Jefferson
supposedly fails, nor did Washington: emancipate the slaves, give up the
farm, go to work. Many decried against slavery, as did George Mason, and
many probably supported anti-slavery societies, without emancipating their
slaves. So, why is there a bull's eye on Jefferson?

Richard E. Dixon
Clifton, VA 20124-2115
703-830-8177
fax 703-691-0978



> [Original Message]
> From: John Maass <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 12/6/2005 3:48:50 PM
> Subject: Re: "common-sense Jeffersonian conservative principles"
>
> Other prominent Founding Fathers who were members of societies for ending
slavery included Richard Bassett, James Madison, James Monroe, Bushrod
Washington, Charles Carroll, William Few, John Marshall, though I don;t
think all of these men freed their slaves.  Robert Carter did so--a new
book about him is:
> The First Emancipator : The Forgotten Story of Robert Carter, the
Founding Father Who Freed His Slaves, by
> Andrew Levy.
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Paul Finkelman
>   To: [log in to unmask]
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 3:41 PM
>   Subject: Re: "common-sense Jeffersonian conservative principles"
>
>
>   Mr. Dixon writes:  "None of the founding fathers in the slaves states
>   freed their slaves."
>
>   I guess that Washington was no a founding father?  Or Henry Laurens in
>   South Carolina? Or Ben Franklin (Pa. was a slave state when he freed his
>   slaves).
>   Also, even Jefferson freed a few (8 in all);
>
>   Yes, TJ was in debt, but that is how he chose to live is life.  Just as
>   Henry Wiencek refers you to his book on Washington, I urge you to read
>   the last two chapters of my book Slavery and the Founders:  Race and
>   Liberty in the Age of Jefferson where I deal with some of the issues set
>   out below.
>
>   Richard Dixon wrote:
>
>   >Your query on the antipathy to Jefferson among many slave study
academics
>   >should elicit some interesting responses. In the posts, much is made of
>   >Washington freeing his slaves. All credit to what he did, but what he
did
>   >was provide for their manumission after the death of his wife. He
benefited
>   >from the system during his entire life and intended that Martha also
retain
>   >the slaves until her death. As it turned out, she emancipated them
early,
>   >possibly as one post notes, because of the fear that she would be
>   >assassinated. It should also be noted that this did not include the
dower
>   >slaves Martha brought to the marriage, who were passed to the heirs of
her
>   >first husband and continued in slavery. Not that Washington could have
done
>   >anything to prevent that, but during his life, he was largely silent on
>   >slavery, while Jefferson was vocal on the evils of the system,
contrary to
>   >one post that essentially claimed Jefferson did nothing during his
life to
>   >reject this institution. None of the founding fathers in the slaves
states
>   >freed their slaves. There is anecdotal evidence that some planters
did, but
>   >because Jefferson did not, he alone is branded as immoral. Under
Virginia
>   >law, slaves were personal property, and no slaves could be freed unless
>   >released by the creditors of the owner. Jefferson, continuously in debt
>   >from the time he left the presidency, could never have secured release
of
>   >the slaves as collateral for his debts. Again, under Virginia law, the
>   >owner was responsible for the upkeep of the freed slave for one year
when
>   >the slave could remain in Virginia, a financial obligation Jefferson
could
>   >not meet. One post asserted that Washington waived this requirement
that
>   >the slave leave Virginia after one year, which Washington had no
authority
>   >to do. Jefferson was condemned in one post for sitting on the mountain
at
>   >Monticello, spending his money on wine rather than arranging his
finances
>   >to free his slaves. Possibly, he could have been a better money
manager.
>   >Maybe this poster has done research not yet made public, but the
depression
>   >in Virginia in 1819 made all planters land poor and locked into the
chattel
>   >slavery system. And to further batter the Jefferson image, he is
depicted
>   >as the father of children by his slave Sally Hemings, all of whom he
kept
>   >in slavery without acknowledgment or favor. This on evidence so thin
that
>   >no contemporary observer has ever surfaced to testify, even though two
of
>   >the children were born after the claim by Callender in the press, while
>   >Jefferson was president, and in the public eye. Jefferson was worse
than
>   >that however. One poster claims that "no one disputes" that Hemings
was the
>   >half-sister to Martha Jefferson. Well, there is absolutely no proof of
>   >this, but this provides another basis for condemnation, because if
>   >Jefferson is not the father, but another Jefferson is, the children
are his
>   >nieces and nephews and he holds them as slaves. An so on.
>   >
>   >Richard E. Dixon
>   >Attorney at Law
>   >4122 Leonard Drive
>   >Fairfax, VA 22030
>   >703-691-0770
>   >fax 703-691-0978
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >>[Original Message]
>   >>From: Bland Whitley <[log in to unmask]>
>   >>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>   >>Date: 12/6/2005 12:32:29 PM
>   >>Subject: Re: "common-sense Jeffersonian conservative principles"
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>Apropos to this current debate over the relative sins/merits of
>   >>Jefferson and Washington: what accounts for the central importance
>   >>members of this list have placed on the personal character of these
>   >>founders? The argument that seems to be developing places Jefferson at
>   >>one end of the political and cultural spectrum of Revolutionary-era
>   >>Virginia and Washington at the other. Whereas Jefferson becomes the
>   >>original sinner, the source of scientific racism, parochial
>   >>states-rights ideology, and opportunistic governance, Washington
shines
>   >>forth as the far-sighted, anti-racist model for a fair-minded
republic.
>   >>Are there not more complicated, incisive ways of analyzing this
>   >>material? Or does the health of our republic and our view of history
>   >>depend on knocking down one straw man and elevating another?
>   >>
>   >>I ask these questions not in defense of Jefferson. As most of his
recent
>   >>biographers have shown, he grows more personally repellant the closer
>   >>one gets to him. But the recent campaigns against him seem to adopt an
>   >>attitude that America will suddenly be sanitized by expunging his
>   >>influence over our political culture. If only we follow in the
footsteps
>   >>of those with sterling character (like Adams and Washington), the
>   >>argument goes, we can finally overcome the knotty contradictions that
>   >>bedevil us. Well, sorry, I don't buy it. I may find inspiration in the
>   >>leadership and character of Washington and in the words and ideals of
>   >>Jefferson (some of them anyway), but it seems folly to reduce our
study
>   >>of the past to a search for appropriate models.
>   >>
>   >>Washington, as Henry Wiencek has shown, did in some respects transcend
>   >>the political culture that produced him, while Jefferson seems to have
>   >>been consumed by it, but both ultimately shared more similarities than
>   >>differences. Somewhere in there may lie a more fruitful discussion. Or
>   >>maybe not.
>   >>
>   >>Bland Whitley
>   >>
>   >>To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
>   >>instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>   >>
>   >>To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
instructions
>   >>at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>   >>
>   >>
>   >
>   >To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
instructions
>   >at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>   >
>   >
>
>   --
>   Paul Finkelman
>   Chapman Distinguished Professor of Law
>   University of Tulsa College of Law
>   3120 East 4th Place
>   Tulsa, OK   74104-3189
>
>   918-631-3706 (office)
>   918-631-2194 (fax)
>
>   [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>   To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
instructions
>   at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US