LISTSERV - VA-HIST Archives - LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	VA-HIST Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: STATE'S RIGHTS ON THE COMEBACK
From:	[log in to unmask]
Reply To:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 8 Oct 2008 22:23:06 -0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (32 lines)

My point is very simple--for whatever reason, the Court *does* defer to Publius' opinion.

I am not asserting anything about "would" or "should."  I am making an empirical assertion about the actual behavior of the Court.  

All best,
Kevin

---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:55:19 -0400
>From: Edward Truslow <[log in to unmask]>  
>Subject: Re: STATE'S RIGHTS ON THE COMEBACK  
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>Notwithstanding the opinion of the Supreme Court, exactly who voted on or 
>ratified the writings of Publius?  Surely Virginia's "Ratification Document" signed 
>by a duly elected body would or should hold as much or more weight than 
>published opinions ratified by nobody.
> 
>Ed Truslow
>Williamsburg, VA
>
>______________________________________
>To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
>http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
Kevin R. Hardwick, Ph.D.
Department of History
James Madison University

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US