Herbert,
Simply because you say the same of others, and I am determined to see you
that you experience the feelings you inflict on others.
When you stop telling us that those with different interpretations are
LIARS, then I will let yours slide.
There is absolutely NO PROOF that the name "Sandy" has any other meaning
than that imposed by those who named him irrespective of your
suppositioning. You insist that you are moved only by PROOF, yet you inflict
this nonsense with absolutely no PROOF whatsoever. Furthermore, you
conjecture a son of Sandy as Sally's partner, and you have no PROOF that
Sandy had a son or that the son was light-skinned or light-colored. And, you
have NO PROOF that Sally even took a notice in his directions. Sally had
absolutely no requirement whatsoever to service Son of Sandy's needs. She
was constrained to meet the needs of whatever Jefferson's Thomas may have
assigned her to. Which bring me back to the point I made some time back that
you constant assertion that Thomas provided her to other relatives makes him
sound like a PIMP.
Anne
Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]http://www.erols.com/apemberthttp://www.educationalsynthesis.org
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
