VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Debra Jackson/Harold Forsythe <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:27:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Jim,

  You don't give a date for the bill.  With such a small number of voters,
could this bill have been Antebellum?  If so, VA didn't have paper ballots
at all, voting was done viva voce.

Harold S. Forsythe
Golieb Fellow
New York University, School of Law
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Watkinson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:21 AM
Subject: QU: "ballot tubes"


Listers:



Today I ran across a bill from Orange County (Va) to a firm named
Larmand & O'Sullivan for "130 ballot tubes," price $0.75 total.  Has
anyone on either list HEARD of ballot tubes?  Given the small number of
eligible voters, 130 would likely have been plenty for the entire
county.  Was this a "double measure" to protect the secret ballot with
the tubes being placed in the ballot box?



Any answers on- or off-line appreciated and, as always, pardon the
cross-post.



Regards,



Jim Watkinson



James D. Watkinson, Ph.D.

Archives

Library of Virginia

[log in to unmask]

804.692.3804




To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US