I agree. This "peculiar" fascination of some who apparently see themselves as the guardians against the return of slavery I have always found odd.
SOUTHMAYD & MILLER4 OCEAN RIDGE BOULEVARD SOUTH
PALM COAST, FLORIDA 32137
386.445.9156
888.557.3686 FAX
[log in to unmask]
**********************************************************
THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE ADDRESSEE SHOWN ABOVE. IT MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, PLEASE DO NOT READ, COPY, OR USE IT, AND DO NOT DISCLOSE IT TO OTHERS. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER OF THE DELIVERY ERROR BY REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE AND THEN DELETE IT FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.
********************************************************
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 09:57:44 -0500
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: The Peculiar Institution's End Without The Intervention Of The Civil War
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> It is not fair or just to impose 2012 mores and ideology on 16th, 17th and
> 18th century happenings. We all know that SLAVERY was and is horrible. We
> have grown and hopefully become better citizens, because of the War, because
> we know better and just because we know slavery is wrong. I have to believe
> that some Pearson's and Hawkins' families tried to be better and to do the
> right things when they could. I have seen wills releasing 'slaves' from the
> servitude and giving them homes and protection from other white slave
> holders for them and their heirs.
> Slavery was what it was. It ended in the USA in 1865. We need to quit
> fighting the war and tried to move forward.
> JP Adams
> Texas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Kiracofe
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:22 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: The Peculiar Institution's End Without The Intervention Of The
> Civil War
>
> I don't read the various comments made concerning the WPA recollections as
> attempting rebuttal, but only supplying the caveat of considering the
> historical context in which the documents were created. I'm quite sure
> that many elderly, formerly-enslaved people living in the depths of the
> Depression would be nostalgic for a time when their material needs were
> taken care of, however meanly. But context does still matter. For
> example, there are a few examples among the WPA narratives of individuals
> who were interviewed twice -- once by a white reporter and subsequently by a
> black reporter -- with marked differences in the telling of their stories.
> Evidently there was some reluctance in talking freely with the white WPA
> reporter. Are we surprised? Isn't that information relevant as we try to
> figure the reason for those different versions? Why then wouldn't the age
> of the person -- how long a recollection -- or their particular economic and
> social circumstances -- how nostalgic -- at least merit a mention as well?
>
> Consideration of context is responsible historical scholarship.
>
> David Kiracofe
> ________________________________________
> From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
> [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Southmayd
> [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 8:05 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: The Peculiar Institution's End Without The Intervention Of The
> Civil War
>
> I am amused by the attempts to rebut the first hand recollections of actual
> Black slaves when those recollections are inconsistent with the PC views of
> slavery held by current members of academia. There is really no reason to
> not take those recollections at face value, PC considerations aside, other
> than it may make "research" and works issued pursuant thereto or published
> seem specious and irrelevant.
> JDS
>
> SOUTHMAYD & MILLER4 OCEAN RIDGE BOULEVARD SOUTH PALM COAST, FLORIDA 32137
> 386.445.9156
> 888.557.3686 FAX
>
> [log in to unmask]
> **********************************************************
> THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE ADDRESSEE SHOWN ABOVE. IT MAY
> CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED
> FROM DISCLOSURE. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, PLEASE DO NOT READ,
> COPY, OR USE IT, AND DO NOT DISCLOSE IT TO OTHERS. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER
> OF THE DELIVERY ERROR BY REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE AND THEN DELETE IT FROM
> YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.
> ********************************************************
>
>
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> ________________________________
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
> and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any access,
> use, disclosure or distribution of this email message by anyone other than
> the intended recipient(s) is unauthorized and prohibited. If you are not an
> intended recipient (or an agent acting on an intended recipient's behalf),
> please contact the sender by reply email and immediately destroy all copies
> of the original message. Virus scanning is recommended on all email
> attachments.
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
