VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Smith at dhova <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Smith at dhova <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:51:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Having just watched a Netflix DVD on US Grant, I am puzzled by his rank and that of Robert E. Lee.  Everything I can read about Grant says he was promoted to Lt. General, the first person since Washington to hold it.  Nothing about being promoted to Full General.  Yet the DVD clearly shows four stars on his shoulderin his latter days of the Civil War.

On the other hand, Robert E. Lee is continually referred to on the Web as 'General.'  However, photos I can find of him show only three stars, which in the old corps was Lt. General.  On the other hand, I did find one reference that Lee was indeed promoted to full (four-star) general at some point. 

So perhaps Grant was given some temporary (brevet?) promotion to four stars at Appomatox, so that he was of equal rank to the man surrendering to him.

Any help greatly appreciated.

Randy Cabell

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US