VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Herbert Barger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 May 2008 14:54:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (153 lines)
The reason I keep mentioning the Wetmore/Madison article is because it
was a major "roadmap" used by the Monticello Study Group and if it was
incorrect it would be misleading to researchers. For convenience I
invite you to get a copy of The Jefferson Scandals, A Rebuttal by
Virginius Dabney. 

Herb



Herbert,

After I get going on my new category for Famous Americans on the
Founding 
Fathers, I will look up the article on Madison Hemings that you keep 
mentioning. If you have a link to the article, it would be great of you
to 
share it and save me a search.

Most folks have heard stories in their families about things that
happened 
at their birth. Last spring, my niece had a little girl, and when I saw
the 
tiny bundle the next day, she gave me a very pretty smile. A year later,
she 
is still quite the smiler. When she is grown, I will tell her that she 
smiled at me before she was a day old. When she learns that babies do
not 
have real smiles until they are older, she may discount what I tell her.
So 
be it. I till tell her anyway!

I tell a nephew, who is now in the throes of adolescence, that he sent
his 
first email when he was six weeks old, and his mother insists he was
older. 
He will certainly not remember if it was a six weeks or thirteen weeks,
and 
it's probably immaterial which memory is right. But the fact is that,
gas 
notwithstanding, Lilly gave me a pretty smiles, and no matter how many 
weeks, Taylor came to the Internet in his infancy. I would have for
someone 
to hang either of these young folks for repeating one or the other side
of 
these stories and be misjudged for repeating what they have or will have

heard over and over growing up.

The same applies to Madison's statement of Dolley naming him. Maybe it
was 
Dolley herself who told the pretty young boy that she had been there at
his 
birth. And, maybe indeed she misremembered which of Sally's children she
was 
there to name. We do not know where the mistake came from, we only know
that 
a mistake was made, and it wasn't by either Madison Hemings, nor,
likely, by 
the man who wrote the newspaper article. To classify either one a liar
or to 
discredit the rest of the article without appropriate study, is to fail
to 
understand the meaning of TRUTH and LIES as well as the humanity of 
humanity.

Anne

Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]
http://www.erols.com/apembert
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Herbert Barger" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: Jefferson's Overseer No proof that the Pike Co. article is 
believable


> The "misstatement" made by Wetmore/Madison about his naming is just
one
> of several doubtful remarks made in this article. If this one
statement
> is wrong....how are we to be expected to believe any of it?
>
> Herb
>
>
> Herb,
>
> I would like to read all those articles you cite, but I'm not sure
where
> to
> find them. I will not guarantee that my reading them will lead me to
the
>
> conclusions you came from. I do not feel the statement on who was
there
> at
> his birth and named him is material enough to negate anything else in
> the
> article.
>
> From the picture in Lanier's book, it seems that the entry was made in
> the
> same handwriting as the list of names. Certainly scientific tests can
> confirm that both the handwriting and the ink were there on the
original
>
> signed by the official at the top of the page. Census records are
> valuable
> evidence of when and where people lived and what offspring they had.
If
> they
> were typically subject to changes made by unauthorized persons, I
would
> imagine they could not be useful in typical geneological research, yet
> they
> are, in the absence of family bibles or actual birth and death
> certificates.
>
> Well, I'm a gonna hit the hay, and we'll pick this up some more
> tomorrow.
>
> Anne
>
> Anne Pemberton
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.erols.com/apembert
> http://www.educationalsynthesis.org
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
instructions
> at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
instructions 
> at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html 

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US