VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:37:16 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (85 lines)
Ladies and Gentlemen,

This was forwarded to me by a friend.  (1) Is it true?  (2) Is this usual 
practice? and 
(3) What else can we do to stop it?  Thanks.

Karen E. Sutton

============================================================= 

>From: [log in to unmask]
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: [VAGLOUCE-L] Re: Immediate Need To Email and Phone VA Legislators
>Date: 9 Feb 2003 17:22:50 -0700
>
>This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.
>
>Classification: Query
>
>Message Board URL:
>
>http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/hAC.2ACE/1289.1
>
>Message Board Post:
>
>To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], 
>[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], 
>[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], 
>[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], 
>[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
>
>Re: SB818 Destruction of VA Wills
>
>Dear Sirs and Madam:
>
>I come from a long line of Virginians--in fact ALL of my maternal ancestors 
>were from Virginia--and I'm distressed by the possible passage of SB818 in 
>its current form.
>
>My concerns are for the destruction of original wills are threefold:
>
>1) This bill is being presented and passed too fast for constituents and 
>families of the Virginians with archived wills to voice their opinions in 
>this most important question of Virginia and our families' historical 
>preservation of records. Furthermore, no time is given for the retrieval of 
>already archived wills.
>
>2) The destruction of records that could be successfully retained by State 
>and County Libraries and Historical Societies. No time has been given for 
>these public sources' voices to be heard. Furthermore, there is no clause 
>to allow these public sources to save our original Virginia archives and I 
>hope one will be included.
>
>3) The destruction of records replicated on microfilm that does not have 
>longevity may cause permanent loss of records. There is no clause that 
>specifies the manner in which archives are to be preserved; the best manner 
>being digital photos and silver halide film. This, in itself, could result 
>in the permanent loss of Virginia heritage. Clearly, there has already been 
>much tragic loss of our history.
>
> >From http://www.archives.state.ut.us/preserv/guide/microfor.htm#longevity
>
>"Documents with permanent retention periods must be reformatted on the most 
>stable medium possible if they are to be used into the indefinite future. 
>Silver halide film can last more than 500 years if it is manufactured, 
>processed, and stored properly. When choosing a microfilm system, it is 
>important to decide ahead of time if the film must be of archival quality."
>
>I look forward to hearing more about possible remedies in SB818 for these 
>concerns.
>
>Very truly yours,
>
>Donna Lynn Snelling
>
>
>
>==== VAGLOUCE Mailing List ====
>Do you appreciate this list?  Ever found helpful free source material on 
>the VAGenWeb project pages?  If so, show your appreciation by contributing 
>a transcription to the Gloucester County Archives.

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US