VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Kiracofe <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:11:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Anne:  Sadly, the best reason for Virginia's secession was the perpetuation of slavery.  Here is Henry Wise addressing the delegates at the Virginia secession convention: "You talk about slavery in the territories; you talk about slavery in the District of Columbia -- when its tenure in Virginia is doubtful."

David Kiracofe

David Kiracofe
History
Tidewater Community College
Chesapeake Campus
1428 Cedar Road
Chesapeake, Virginia 23322
757-822-5136
>>> Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]> 06/19/07 2:57 PM >>>
Walter,

Thanks for an interesting post.

What I wonder was what grievance Virginia had with the United States that 
could have supported a request to secede.

I have heard the arguments against the tarriffs that made imported goods 
more expensive than home-made ones. I've seen too much antique stuff in 
yankee country to be convinced that they were producing "inferior goods". As 
to the right to carry their "property" into other states which outlaw such 
"property", that has always seemed a rather indefensible position to me. The 
fact that the balance of power was changing in the Congress, with the 
admission of more non-slave states seems more like sour grapes than a valid 
reason to secede.

So, did Virginia have any good reason to secede legally?

Anne

Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]
http://www.erols.com/apembert
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US