VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Camille Wells <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:56:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hey Craig. The quorum was that number of county justices--about 4 of the 12
individuals--who had to be present before the county court could initiate
their session. A bit of hierarchy within the hierarchy of the
self-perpetuating roster of magistrates--that is, when one of their number
died or resigned, the remaining 11 chose his successor.

Hope this helps.
Your pedantic friend,
Camille.

> Question for all. I am reading an endnote (#294, p. 178) to Edward Porter
> Alexander's *The Journal of John Fontaine*. He says here about James Fontaine
> in King William County that "he served on the quorum."  Quorum of what? This
> would be between 1718 and 1735.
> 
> Craig Kilby
> 
> "
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US