VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Religious freedom?
From:
James Brothers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:31:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines) 
Frankly I missed that entirely as I have been block deleting the
entire discussion. The entire Jefferson paternity discussion is
tedious. That someone felt it necessary to dump on Republicans in the
middle of it is not terribly surprising. Clearly ignoring the thread
was the correct course of action.

On Dec 6, 2005, at 15:39, John Maass wrote:

> I find it interesting that the only reaction so far to Mr.
> Finkleman's initial statements about Jefferson and Senator Allen's
> remarks are about TJ's "problem" with slavery.  Mr. Finkleman also
> made a very sweeping and preposterous statement that conservatives/
> Republicans are against religious freedom in the US today.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
> John R. Maass
> Dept. of History
> The Ohio State University
> 230 West 17th Ave
> 106 Dulles Hall
> Columbus, OH  43210-1367
> http://history.osu.edu/people/person.cfm?ID=1490


To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US