Is this available?
Is this the name of the book?
Born in Slavery: Slave Narratives from the Federal Writers' Project,
1936-1938
JP Adams
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Southmayd
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 1:50 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: The Peculiar Institution's End Without The Intervention Of The
Civil War
Well, if you have ever reviewed Born in Slavery: Slave Narratives from the
Federal Writers' Project, 1936-1938, that contains more than 2,300
first-person accounts of slavery and 500 black-and-white photographs of
former slaves you were probably surprised at the level of nostalgia
expressed repeatedly for the good life back on the master's land where they
had a roof over their heads and food on the table and didn't have to work
all that hard. I found it to be a very illuminating project with first hand
descriptions of the lives of slaves in the South.
SOUTHMAYD & MILLER4 OCEAN RIDGE BOULEVARD SOUTH PALM COAST, FLORIDA 32137
386.445.9156
888.557.3686 FAX
[log in to unmask]
**********************************************************
THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE ADDRESSEE SHOWN ABOVE. IT MAY
CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED
FROM DISCLOSURE. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, PLEASE DO NOT READ,
COPY, OR USE IT, AND DO NOT DISCLOSE IT TO OTHERS. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER
OF THE DELIVERY ERROR BY REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE AND THEN DELETE IT FROM
YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.
********************************************************
> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 13:19:31 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: The Peculiar Institution's End Without The Intervention
> Of The Civil War
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> I understand what slavery was all about, unfortunately. Coercive means
were indeed applied, and there were owners who were far better than others.
One of the Eppes read his "Compact with the Slaves" where I grew up that
detailed what he would provide and what they would be expected to provide. I
would contrast that with the horrors of the sugar cane plantations that were
a death sentence, period. But still, slavery was something no one should
have had to endure, period.
>
> When there is no hope of improvement, there is no incentive to pick up the
pace, hence the coercion. Add the fear factors, the superior attitude and
all the other little psychological quirks to justify actions, and it was
never a system that should have been allowed.
>
> I had no thoughts of inherent character flaws with my statement about
passive-aggressive behavior. I see it as anyone's rational reaction to the
situation that people find themselves enmeshed and powerless within, whether
black, white or purple. It has been my distinct displeasure to have had to
work with people (95% - 100% white) who felt undervalued and who "worked to
rule" for those reasons and which in the long-term was the hagfish in an
otherwise healthy organization. I had the option of leaving, which slaves
did not.
>
> Equally unfortunately, learned helplessness over several generations can
lead to a situation where the so-called stereotype becomes the actual. Part
of that may be camouflage that gets one out of tight situations and part of
it may be generated by something else. It seems that each side of the coin
had a set of entrenched behavioral expectations that more or less governed
the social interaction.
>
> Lyle
>
>
> On May 9, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Hardwick, Kevin - hardwick wrote:
>
> > Lyle--
> >
> > Thank you for your constructive reframing of Mr. Southmayd's provocative
comment.
> >
> > It may be useful to step back, and consider just what slavery is, at the
most basic level. Slavery is an institutional means for extracting work
from people. Unlike other means for accomplishing this, slavery offers no
reward or contractual exchange for persons subject to it. Rather, in a
slave regime, what motivates slaves to work is fear of being subject to
coercive physical violence. Slavery is a "regime" because it is a political
and legal institution--for it to work, the owners of slaves have to be
exempted from the legal sanctions normally imposed for violence against
other people (i.e. the normal legal sanctions for battery, assault, rape,
and murder).
> >
> > In a slave regime, its not just the "cool hand Luke's" who are subject
to violence. Even in the absence of people who offer overt resistance, a
slave regime has to enforce a constant, low level of exemplary violence in
order to motivate the other slaves. As Fogel and Engerman demonstrated many
years ago in their book TIME ON THE CROSS, there were surprisingly little
sustained brutal whipping on 19th century plantations--on average, if I am
remembering correctly "only" one or two per year. But that one or two
whippings--or similar exemplary violence, was a necessary feature of
slavery. The whole point of owning a slave is that you do not have to pay
them.
> >
> > As you note, in practice, most slaves responded by doing only so much
work as was necessary to avoid punishment--a kind of passive resistance.
From the perspective of masters, this surely looked like laziness.
Similarly, from the perspective of "Free Labor" Republicans in the North
(here, read Eric Foner's superb book on the Republican ideology of the
1850s), one of the many problems with slavery was that it did not engender
strong work habits in the slaves (the Republican critique of slavery was
multithreaded). Because substantial numbers of 19th century people,
including some people who had experienced slavery, thought this way, it is
not difficult to locate 19th century sources which condemn slavery for
(among many other things) inducing laziness in the slaves.
> >
> > I would argue, however, that under the circumstances, and considering
the nature of the work incentives involved, the response of most slaves to
their work situation was rational, and not indicative of a character flaw.
I would argue this because, once these men and women secured their freedom,
they were anything but lazy. When they confronted the same incentives to
work as did most other American men and women, they worked just as hard, and
for the same reasons.
> >
> > All best wishes,
> > Kevin
> > ___________________________
> > Kevin R. Hardwick
> > Associate Professor
> > Department of History, MSC 8001
> > James Madison University
> > Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
> > [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Lyle E. Browning
> > [[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 6:56 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: The Peculiar Institution's End Without The Intervention
> > Of The Civil War
> >
> > Mr. Southmayd has an "interesting" mode of expression and although
provocative, it bears looking at more closely. Is there a kernel of truth or
more than a kernel but a good percentage of truth in his statement? Managing
property that didn't want to be property has long been a bone of contention.
The photo of that one slave who had a terribly scarred back is always
trotted out as an example of the worst behavior by the ownership side.
There's always going to be a "Cool hand Luke" who will go that route despite
the physical and mental pain just because...
> >
> > Passive-aggressive behavior is what folks who have no power take up to
"stick it to the man". I don't think there's any serious disagreement with
that statement. And from personal observation, that sort of thing was the
norm until the "Mexican Invasion" whereby the little buggers worked their
backsides off and displaced the folks who had previously done that kind of
labor. What I saw was that for the first time, there was active competition,
leading to the definite up-tick in pace and response to where the
passive-aggressive lessened to the point it was about invisible. I just
mention that as an observation, not a judgment.
> >
> > Mr. Southmayd has identified the sale of northern Southern slaves
southward to where manual labor was still needed. If I could somehow
correlate that with the sales of McCormick reapers and similar equipment,
I'd be a happy camper. My degree is in history, not economics, but I see the
economic side of the equation as the 800lb gorilla in the corner of the
room. Are there studies to show that the cost of human maintenance versus
farm equipment purchase pays off on the human side? If one looks at areas
where there were small farms in the greater Mississippi Valley west to the
Great Plains and north to Canada, it is these folks who never owned slaves
who are buying into mechanization. At least, that's what I think I am seeing
from the limited info I have yet been able to accumulate.
> >
> > Let's not go all PC on Mr. Southmayd and throw out the baby with the
bathwater, please. We are all mature enough to withstand a bit of silliness,
surely. Gregg Kimball can draw that line as he so ably has in the past.
> >
> > Lyle Browning
> >
> >
> > On May 8, 2012, at 4:48 PM, EV Pace wrote:
> >
> >> "accounts of how lazy and shiftless many were" what is your source for
your declarations? Source or not your racist leanings are in plain view.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Jeff Southmayd <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Sent: Tue, 08 May 2012 18:41:12 -0000 (UTC)
> >> Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] The Peculiar Institution's End Without The
> >> Intervention Of The Civil War
> >>
> >> I would think based on accounts of how expensive slaves were to
purchase and provide for, and accounts of how lazy and shiftless many were,
Southerners would be pleased to substitute technology for the problems and
expense involved in keeping slaves in their work force. With a ready market
like Brazil for the sale of their slaves, they would have an out to recoup
what they had into their slaves. While there may not have been a widespread
movement for emancipation in the South, there was a widespread discussion on
what to do with the burgeoning slave population which was becoming more and
more problematic, to the extent that the northern Southern states were
moving away from slavery and selling them to the deep Southern states.
> >>
> >> SOUTHMAYD & MILLER4 OCEAN RIDGE BOULEVARD SOUTH PALM COAST, FLORIDA
> >> 32137
> >> 386.445.9156
> >> 888.557.3686 FAX
> >>
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >> **********************************************************
> >> THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE ADDRESSEE SHOWN ABOVE. IT
MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, OR OTHERWISE
PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, PLEASE DO
NOT READ, COPY, OR USE IT, AND DO NOT DISCLOSE IT TO OTHERS. PLEASE NOTIFY
THE SENDER OF THE DELIVERY ERROR BY REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE AND THEN DELETE
IT FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.
> >> ********************************************************
> >>
> >>> Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 10:44:50 -0700
> >>> From: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: Re: The Peculiar Institution's End Without The
> >>> Intervention Of The Civil War
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>>
> >>> much different set of facts. Indian removal involved about 30,000
persons, overland, over a period of time. Many self-removed before the
infamous forced removals. Plus they provided their own transport.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: "Kimball, Gregg (LVA)"
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 1:24 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] The Peculiar Institution's End Without The
> >>> Intervention Of The Civil War
> >>>
> >>> Where did the United States find the money to remove Native Americans
to the West? As Bill Freehling has pointed out, it at least demonstrates
that the national government had the political will to execute a removal
program given the right incentives. I freely admit that there were many
differences in the two circumstances, but it gave a certain veneer of
plausibility to colonization.
> >>>
> >>> Gregg Kimball
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
> >>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Finkelman, Paul
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 1:05 PM
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] The Peculiar Institution's End Without The
> >>> Intervention Of The Civil War
> >>>
> >>> Hard to imagine where would have found the ships and money for a mass
exodus to Liberia.
> >>>
> >>> ========================================
> >>>
> >>> Paul Finkelman
> >>> President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law Albany
> >>> Law School
> >>> 80 New Scotland Avenue
> >>> Albany, NY 12208
> >>>
> >>> 518-445-3386 (p)
> >>> 518-445-3363 (f)
> >>>
> >>> [log in to unmask]
> >>> www.paulfinkelman.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
> >>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Craig Kilby
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 12:34 PM
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] The Peculiar Institution's End Without The
> >>> Intervention Of The Civil War
> >>>
> >>> I wrote that, and it was in connection Lincoln's initial plan to send
freed slaves to Liberia. I clearly stated that that was veering off topic of
this thread. Lincoln abandoned that plan due to vocal opposition from the
black community.
> >>>
> >>> That sentence was part of a larger "conjecture" of how slavery
> >>> would have ended had the South won, whenever it ended, if it would
> >>> ever end (and it surely would.)
> >>>
> >>> Craig Kilby
> >>>
> >>> On May 7, 2012, at 11:53 PM, Finkelman, Paul wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> One post suggested that "hundreds of thousands of blacks" might have
gone to Liberia? On what boats? How many ships were around to move them?
Who would pay for it?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________
> >>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> >>> instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________
> >>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> >>> instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________
> >>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> >>> instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________
> >>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> >>> instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> >>
> >> ______________________________________
> >> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> >> instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> >>
> >> ______________________________________
> >> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> >> instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> >
> > ______________________________________
> > To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> > instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> >
> > ______________________________________
> > To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> > instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
