VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Finkelman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:47:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
I wonder why people who freed their slaves are "religious fanatics" and southern ministers who wrote sermons on how Christianity allowed for slaveholding were not "religious fanatics."   

The Pleasants family members who freed their slaves were pretty run-of-the-mill Quakers. 

John and Henry Laurens of South Carolina freed their slaves for political reasons. 

Paul Finkelman
President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law
     and Public Policy
Albany Law School
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, New York   12208-3494

518-445-3386 
[log in to unmask]
>>> [log in to unmask] 04/30/08 10:07 AM >>>
> How many of the wealthiest slaveowners freed their
> slaves? Joseph Mayo, the Randolph, Pleasant and
Carter 
> families come to mind since they freed a total of
well 
> over a thousand slaves. But the were just religious 
> fanatics who thought all men are created equal.
> Paul 

George Washington freed his slaves in his will, though
he didn't (and couldn't) free the Custis dower slaves,
which caused major problems when the Washington slaves
were manumitted.

Jessica

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US