VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anita Wills <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:27:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
Anne,
Great Post! This is one point that was missing in the discussion on Islam. 
The role that religion played in slavery. You answered my unasked question.


Anita

>From: Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history         
>      <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Slavery and Unanswered Questions
>Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:04:13 -0400
>
>Actually, according to the Jamestown Narratives, and what I am reading on 
>the Pennsylvania Colony and its relationship to the Indians, "saving" the 
>Indians had little to do with the goals of the colonies.
>
>Jamestown came to seek riches. When they discovered the riches in tobacco, 
>they wanted land. The Pennsylvania colonists came specifically for land. 
>Land, was the most desired commodity. The Natives were on the land, so the 
>notion of calling them savages, marginalizing them, making them slaves in 
>accordance with the Old Testament commands, and feebly trying to 
>Christianize them (then totally ignoring those who converted when removal 
>was the goal), were the initiatives involved. I'm not as knowledgeable on 
>the Massachusetts colony, but again, the goal seems to have been to secure 
>land, with a feeble intent to Christianize the Indians, again with the 
>colonists ignoring the Christians among the Indians when removal became the 
>goal.
>
>As soon as the Indians posed any resistance to the colonists intents, the 
>saying "The only good Indian is a dead Indian" spread throughout the 
>colony, whichever one it was.
>
>There seems to be little distinction among the Puritan colonists in 
>Massachusetts, the Quaker colonists in Pennsylvania, and the Corporate 
>colonists in Virginia. They all seemed to follow the same agenda. The 
>Indians as slaves had one advantage over the African slaves - they knew the 
>lay of the land better than their owners and could escape almost at will. 
>The Africans did not know their way around and were stuck in place.
>
>Anne
>Anne Pemberton
>[log in to unmask]
>http://www.erols.com/apembert
>http://www.educationalsynthesis.org

_________________________________________________________________
Picture this – share your photos and you could win big!  
http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US