VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:43:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Maitland, I'm confused.  You say Lee say secession was wrong. Are you
making a distinction between "wrong" and illegal? Anne

Virginia did not wish to secede; R.E. Lee even voiced his opinion that it
>was the wrong thing to do.  Only after Lincoln called for troops to invade
>the South, did the high South vote to withdraw, and even then, there were
>wishes that the situation could be settled peacefully, as witness by the
>Southern delegation that went to Washington, but were refused to be seen.
>Yes, negoations could have helped, if the North would have sat down at the
>table and talked.
>
>I'm sorry to see PC and accepted 'victors' writings being accepted as
>fact.  Many leaders of the South would not have sided with the
>Confederacy, including R.E. Lee, if secession had not been legal, and they
>said so.  Virginia reserved the right to withdraw from the union in it's
>approving document of the constitution, and was accepted by the union as
>such.  Action on one's reserved rights in an legal document accepted by
>all concerned, can hardly be called illegal.

Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US