VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Rowe, Linda" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:34:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
If I recall the original question about marriage, it had to do with the
frequency with which widows and widowers married the sisters and
brothers of deceased spouses. (I don't now recall whether other kindred
relationships were mentioned.) I'll just throw this out there for your
consideration. There was (and is) "A Table of Kindred and Affinity,
wherein whosoever are related, are forbidden in Scripture and our Laws
to Marry together" in every (Church of England) _Book of Common Prayer_.
There are 30 forbidden relationships for men and 30 for women. Number 17
on the list for a man is "Wife's Sister" and #17 for a woman is
"Husband's Brother." If I remember correctly, there is evidence that the
Table of Affinity was posted in some parish churches in colonial
Virginia. Interesting, no? I've no idea whether the table actually
figured in anyone's thinking once you get beyond not marrying immediate
blood relatives (such as grandmother, grandfather, father's sister,
father's brother, and so on). The Table of Affinity did not find its way
into laws passed by the colonial General Assembly, as far as I know.

Linda H. Rowe
Historical Research
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
757-220-7443

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US