VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dr. David S. Hardin" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:54:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
A simple question that probably doesn't have a simple answer: when records
in seventeenth and early eighteenth-century Virginia - especially
pertaining to tobacco - use the term "hundredweight" or "Cwt," were they
considering that 100 or 112 pounds?  Obviously this is important to
deriving an accurate price series.  Unfortunately, in Essex County records,
I have yet to find a document that would reveal what standard they were
using (by that I mean references to pounds and cwt of tobacco with
corresponding prices in the same entry).  I know Avoirdupois units were
pretty much the standard after the Revolution, but have never known when
that standard originated and when it started to come into use. If anyone
has a reference for legislation regarding the hundredweight standard in
colonial Virginia or has an example where the standard is revealed, I would
appreciate it.  I suppose while I'm at it: were they using the short (2,000
lb) or long (2,240 lb) ton?

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US