VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Craig Kilby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:00:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
Fred:

I had to laugh, cry and sob all at one time when I saw your signature  
that said "Fred, St. Louis".

To me, that moniker said it all.

I now live in Virginia and have long wanted to host a party where  
people had to put a pin on map showing where St. Louis is.  I want to  
take parlour bets on this one.  I don't think one in one hundred  
people in Virginia even have clue where, much less what, St. Louis is  
to American history.  I think most of them would put it somewhere in  
Louisiana, assuming they even know where that is. Or sometimes they  
put in Colorado, or Minnesota.

Mississippi River?  "Oh, that thing out there somewhere."

Lewis & Clark?  "Who?"

Louisiana Purchase?  "What?"

Napoleon?  "Is that a new fur coat?"

This is all very amusing.  I miss St. Louis.  I guess this is a bit  
poigent today for me because I had lunch with an old friend who also  
lived in St. Louis, though I did not know her then.  She loved it  
there.  I am going back in July to conduct an interview that I hope  
will become a very good article.

I really, really love Virginia and Virginians, and I am glad to be a  
taxpaying member of the "Virginia is for Lovers" state ( I have yet  
to see that side of the slogan).  But by golly, they have much to  
learn about elsewhere.

Craig



On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:33 PM, John Frederick Fausz wrote:

> Whether she told "lies" or employed "imaginative fabrications"--
> a methodology that one esteemed reviewer called "outrageous"--
> that author has discredited the historical profession and revealed
> the sham of commercial publishing and the once-credible National
> Book Award.  That so few have criticized one of the worst-titled and
> least reliable books of "history"--which sadly beat out a fabulous
> book by the president of Harvard--is a sad commentary on our
> times and the clearest signal yet that factually-accurate research
> and writing are DEAD in this country.  More hype and hyprocrisy
> of a celebrity culture to match our dismal economy and disastrous
> politics!
>
> Fred Fausz
> St. Louis
>
>
> **************
> Get a jump start on your taxes. Find a tax
> professional in your neighborhood today.
> (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=Tax+Return+Preparation+%26 
> +Filing&amp;ncid=emlcntusyelp00000004)
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the  
> instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US