VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Katharine Harbury <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:37:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Thank you for your kind words. Since my research was focused on various
records,perhaps others on the list can provide an answer to your
question. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul Heinegg
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 11:11 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Indian servants/slaves

Thanks Katherine. Very interesting study.

But I wonder why scholars feel the need to quote someone from the Bass
family? Professor Rountree started this nonsense. John Bass married a
Nansemond Indian woman in 1638. There is no evidence that their
descendants had anything to do with the Nansemond tribe or that there
was ever another Indian in their ancestry. There is proof that John's
grandson William Bass married Sarah Lovina, the "Molatto" daughter of a
"Negro" woman slave of Captain John Nicholls in 1729 and that they were
the ancestors of those members of the family who remained in Norfolk
County. The present-day chiefs of the Bass family would be considered
white anywhere outside Norfolk County and surely have more African than
Indian ancestry. Most of their descendants spread to various counties in
North Carolina and married free African Americans.
http://www.freeafricanamericans.com/bailey-berry.htm
Paul 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US