VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Barbara Vines Little, CG, FNGS, FVGS" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:36:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (159 lines)
You might want to take this one step further. What about original 
documents with marginal notations made after the filming? To make 
matters worse, often the digital image is made from the film---not the 
original. Thus even though created at a later date the, digital image 
contains no updated information. And then there are always those 
corrected copies filed later with no notation made on the original.

Barbara Vines Little, CG, FNGS, FVGS

PO Box 1273
Orange, VA 22960
[log in to unmask]
540-832-3473

CG, Certified Genealogist, is a service mark of the Board for 
Certification of Genealogists, used under license by board certified 
genealogists after periodic evaluation, and the board name is registered 
in the US Patent & Trademark Office.


On 3/19/2012 2:34 PM, Alexander Colvin wrote:
> Greetings:
> If I may, I would caution against a too-heavy reliance upon digitized
> sources found on the Internet. They are ubiquitous, true, but IMHO, best
> used as a reference to find the originals. I have found this particularly
> true when working with older documents such as some types of 19th century
> mortgages and leases; for example, clerks often indicated a satisfaction of
> mortgage on the reverse side of the document, a leaf which is sometimes
> missed by digitizers and even sometimes by microfilmers. Also, much was
> expressed in marginalia, which is sometimes omitted in digitized
> renditions. I can think of half a dozen "professional" genealogy databases
> who routinely cut off document margins where relevant data is sometimes
> found.
> Kindly,
> A. Colvin
> The Colvin Study,
> [log in to unmask]
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Rondina Muncy<[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> Eric,
>>
>> My point was that you do not need a database if you can look at digital or
>> microfilmed images of the original documents. Derivative sources are
>> helpful, but reliance on them often leads researchers to overlook documents
>> that will answer their questions.
>>
>> While everyone's tree being online is an ideal, it is only so if the
>> information includes the sources it is based on. Looking at online trees is
>> a low priority for myself and the use of information posted should be
>> followed with research to document the discoveries. The opportunity is
>> there to achieve what you want, but with millions of hobbyists re-posting
>> someone else's inaccurate and undocumented conclusions with no analysis,
>> I will not see this in my lifetime.
>>
>> I do not post to the Muncy tree. My husband was a descendant of Francis
>> Muncy of Virginia.
>>
>> Rondina
>> _______________________
>> Rondina P. Muncy
>> Ancestral Analysis
>> 4008 Linden Avenue
>> Fort Worth, Texas 76107
>> 682.224.6584
>> [log in to unmask]
>> www.ancestralanalysis.com
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Huffstutler, Eric S.<
>> [log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>>
>>> True to a certain point because not all databases are available for
>>> Internet use.  Not everyone's tree is online.  To that we still need
>>> volunteers for lookups and people to post lineage someplace where others
>>> can share and connect to or someone like me, who figure by now certain
>>> branches would have been filled via scan documents, have no way of
>>> knowing if people don't post their finds somewhere.   By not sharing
>>> only creates new brick walls for others.
>>>
>>> Now, I see you are a Muncy.  Have we corresponded before on a Muncy tree
>>> here in Virginia?
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rondina Muncy
>>> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 11:26 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] Genealgy Future
>>>
>>> Eric,
>>>
>>> I believe you are correct in your observation that some genealogical
>>> websites that five to ten years ago were very active don't seem to be
>>> updated. From this we cannot tell whether it is from lack of interest in
>>> the sites by visitors or from lack of interest by persons or groups in
>>> keeping up the sites.
>>>
>>> My theory is that the abstracts and databases that used to be uploaded
>>> and added to on a regular basis have been replaced by digital images of
>>> the original records by repositories of all sorts. It used to be written
>>> in stone that a trip to the library for derivative sources was the first
>>> item in a genealogical research plan. My first step is to now search the
>>> Internet for both derivative and original sources.
>>>
>>> Rondina
>>> _______________________
>>> Rondina P. Muncy
>>> Ancestral Analysis
>>> 4008 Linden Avenue
>>> Fort Worth, Texas 76107
>>> 682.224.6584
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> www.ancestralanalysis.com
>>>
>>> * * *
>>>
>>> This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and
>>> may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are
>>> on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
>>> then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use
>> it
>>> for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you
>>> for your cooperation.
>>> * * *
>>> To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you
>>> that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice
>>> contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not
>>> intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
>> (1)
>>> avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state
>> and
>>> local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
>>> party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
>>> Disclaimer Version RS.US.1.01.03
>>> pdc1
>>>
>>> ______________________________________
>>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
>> at
>>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>>>
>> ______________________________________
>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
>

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US