VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Hershman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:28:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
An echo only in the sense that the losers of the argument in the antebellum
period, the free states, were revisiting the issue on the winning side in 1868.

Jim Hershman

Constantine Gutzman wrote:

> In my understanding, the 14th Amendment's provision was not an echo of, but
> was entirely opposite, the 3/5 clause.  The latter allowed citizens in
> slaveholding regions augmented representation because they held bondsmen,
> while the 14th Amendment was intended to reduce the representation of the
> southern states in proportion to the number of freedmen they disfranchised;
> in other words, former masters no longer would benefit in federal
> apportionment by the presence of people they had subjugated.
> Constantine Gutzman
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Hershman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: 3/5 Compromise
>
> > Sorry if I created confusion. The 3/5 Compromise was adopted at the 1789
> > Constitutional Convention. The reference to the 14th Amendment, adopted in
> > 1868, was that the provision requiring a full reduction in representation
> for
> > the portion of the population denied the ballot was a reaction against, or
> at
> > least an echo, of the antebellum argument over the 3/5 representation of
> > slaves.
> >
> > Jim Hershman
> >
> > Diana Bennett wrote:
> >
> > > One final question on the 3/5 Compromise... From the previous listings I
> > > gather that the 3/5 Compromise was adopted as the 14th Amendment to the
> > > U. S. Constitution when it was written in 1779-ish. Is this correct?
> > >
> > > Diana Bennett
> > >
> > > To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
> instructions
> > > at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> >
> > To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
> > at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US