In a message dated 3/1/07 1:06:37 PM, [log in to unmask] writes:


> In my own work, I try to stay away from over-arching theories and
> look at the microcosm.  Right now, having done a book on George Washington
> and slavery, I'm working on Jefferson and his slaves.  It is fascinating to
> see how Mount Vernon and Monticello, both run by presidents and so close in
> time, place, and size, were nonetheless so different from each other. 
> 
> Henry Wiencek
> 

Dear Henry:

I find both GW and Jefferson fascinating men in their time.   In discussing 
GW vs. Jefferson's ability to free their slaves 100+ vs. just the Hemings 
family, I always point out to folks that GW was a much better businessman and 
farmer than Jefferson was, who was more renaissance man than business pragmatist.  
Running a large 18th century plantation successfully required following 
evolving ag and economic trends (GW started producing whisky out of his corn and was 
one of the largest distillers in the mid Atlantic), being anal about the 
little things and conservative regarding how one spent their money.   None of 
these traits were exhibited by Jefferson who entertained lavishly, spent his money 
on UVA and constantly remodeling Monticello over a generation.   To be frank, 
Jefferson couldn't afford to sell his slaves for risk of depriving his 
offspring of the one economic asset he had during his life.   As it was Jefferson's 
efforts did little good as his estates and his slaves ended up being sold 
after his death with little benefit to his issue.


Anita L. Henderson


**************************************
 AOL now offers free 
email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
http://www.aol.com.

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html