VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:32:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
It is true that the status of the child generally followed that of the
mother; but I'm wondering if, in Virginia in the 1780s, a father's having
Indian blood would trump that law.  So, would the children of a slave
woman be free if their father was part Indian?

Henry Wiencek

> The birth status of a child followed that of the mother.  The child
> would be a free born or slave born based on the mothers status at the
> time of the birth.  I have found reference in South Carolina to an
> Indian woman being a slave as late as 1750.  I don't know when the
> enslavement of Indians ceased in Virginia.
>
> Deborah Byrd
>

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US