VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Henry Wiencek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:13:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
If you take another look at the review you will see that, in context, the
quotation marks around "legitimate" are actually legitimate and have nothing
to do with the reviewer's attitudes or opinions. It is not quite clear to me
why the reviewer put the marks around "owner," but I suspect it is to
emphasize that the ownership of human beings was not just morally wrong but
illegitimate, in the eyes of the reviewer.  So they're subversive quotation
marks. 

As the author of two books about slaves and slavery, with a third on the
way, I wrestle with these linguistic problems every day. When I was writing
"The Hairstons" in the 1990s "enslaved" was coming into wide use, and I
initially disliked the word as a trendy, PC affectation; but the more I
thought about it the more sense it made. It makes us stop, think, and
realize that a slave was not a slave by nature, but was actively compelled
into enslavement by owners and the legal system. In my writing I use both
"slaves" and "the enslaved."  I think the latter is very useful and
accurate. I know it puts some people off, but so be it. 

As Doug Deal writes, "these are not simple questions." Slavery and all its
infernal manifestations deformed our language and our ways of thinking. In
writing about Jefferson, for example, what does it mean to say "white
Jeffersons"?  Obviously, that's shorthand for "members of Thomas Jefferson's
family."  But Eston Hemings (a slave, Sally's youngest son), was a Jefferson
(DNA proved it) and he was white--he passed for white. So are he and his
offspring "white Jeffersons?" This defies the common understanding of the
phrase, but it is literally true. The even simpler phrase "white people"
loses its clear meaning in slavery time because many people who were
enslaved were white. So we cannot use the phrase "white people" to denote a
class of Americans in slavery time who shared a common status, point of
view, etc. And we really can't retreat behind "you know what I mean" if we
want to be--have to be!--accurate. 

Henry Wiencek

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US