VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hist Docs <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:20:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
>So in each case, he *could* have been the father.

Agree.

>"Could have been" is not the same thing as *was* the father. 

Agree.


>But just as critically, if TJ was NOT at Monticello during the range of time in which Sally Hemings most likely >conceived a child, that would be reasonably good evidence that TJ was not the father.  

Agree.

>And for better or worse, we can not rule him out on this basis.

Agree.

So the fact on which I hope we can agree does not *prove* anything.  It is merely suggestive--it establishes, to my mind, a probability.  But it does not prove anything.

Concur and agree.


R Burnett Jenkins


______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US