VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Huddleston <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:26:57 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Well, without the additional electoral votes made possible by the 3/5
compromise, John Adams would have been reelected in 1800 and the
Virginia Dynasty would have been still born.

Take care,

Bob

Judy and Bob Huddleston
10643 Sperry Street
Northglenn, CO  80234-3612
303.451.6376  [log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Diana Bennett
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Elections

Dear Listers:

Thanks for all the feedback on succession. Now I would like some
comments on "Slaves became important around election time. The
legislature representing the South was elected by using three fifths of
the slave population." It sounds like mud slinging such as we've had in
in the late 1900's, but is this possible?

Diana Bennett

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US