VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:51:40 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (136 lines)
I don't think her intentions are good.  They are reverse racism clear  and 
simple.  Slave or otherwise, hanging was too good for him and his  kind.
 
I can't believe anyone would actually teach this Nat Turner crap.
 
J South
 
 
In a message dated 11/13/2008 8:52:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Anne,
Now that you've brought my name up, I must   speak.  If you went to the 
link I gave you and read what the state  wants us  to teach in regard to Nat 
Turner, you would see that like  Kevin's email stated,  it is the 
consequences of 
the rebellion that  is more important.  The  Virginia SOLs do NOT glorify Nat 
 
Turner.  Most of us on this list are  professionals.  I can  only speak for 
myself, but I do not teach selective  history.  I  have an MA in history and 
I tell 
both sides, facts, gore  and all,  but as an 11th grade teacher of U.S. 
History 
and A. P. U.S. History,  I  am trying to get them to think in terms of cause 
and  effect--critical  thinking--NOT telling them what they should  think.  
I'm 
afraid I have not  had time to look at more than  your Nat Turner entry--and 
I 
would not recommend  it to my students  based on that entry--it smacks of 
Wikipedia, another source I  refuse  to let my students use.  Your intentions 
are 
good, but your   methodology is askew.  You've been given some good advice 
from   
historians on this list, I would take their advice.

Cynthia  Hasley



In a message  dated 11/12/2008 7:50:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,   
[log in to unmask] writes:

Kevin,

I followed you advice and  changed the wording of his  "mission from God" to 
that he "reported"  it, which he did in his  "Confession".

The page is not an essay  and I do not provide my  conclusions on other 
pages. 
Of course, with  the exceptions of Jefferson  Davis and Harry Byrd, I have 
not 
dealt  with persons for whom conclusions  can be drawn in such a manner. The  
ONLY reason that Davis and Byrd are on  the site is because they are  in the 
SOLs. The same reason guided me in  including Nat Turner. My  intent is to 
include anyone specifically named in  the SOLs, and  until Ms Hasley said I'd 
missed the fact that Nat Turner was  there,  I thought I had them all.

Anne   Pemberton
[log in to unmask]
http://www.erols.com/apembert
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org
-----   Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kiracofe"   <[log in to unmask]>
To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Sent:  Wednesday, November 12, 2008  1:55 PM
Subject: Re: And Now Nat  Turner


Anne,

As a  matter of historical writing, it matters  not one bit whether you or I  
or any other reader believes in divine  revelation, Turner did and so  your 
sentence simply should reflect that  this was his own  understanding.   I 
don't think that it  clarifies matters  for you, me, or anyone else to 
categorize that  understanding as true  or as delusional.  When I suggested 
in 
my other  post that  Turner's belief might have been delusion, it was only to 
 
emphasize  the point that we really can't know something so  unprovable.  On  
the other hand, Turner's white contemporaries  certainly regarded him  as 
deranged and delusional.  You might  accurately note  that.

As for final judgments of Turner, I don't see why  your  essay can't discuss 
both reasons as well as actions and offer   appropriate judgments on both. 
Was Turner justified in fighting to  end  slavery?  Certainly.   Was 
murdering 
people in  their beds a  bad thing?   Yes.   Indeed, by giving a  fuller  
treatment then you are really in a better position --  rhetorically -- to  
bring in your legitimate critique of the vengeful  response of Virginians  
and 
their government.   Otherwise  you are engaging in an  exercise in 
situational 
ethics in which ends  justify means.    And I don't think you want to do  
that.

David  Kiracofe



David  Kiracofe
History
Tidewater Community  College
Chesapeake  Campus
1428 Cedar Road
Chesapeake, Virginia   23322
757-822-5136

______________________________________
To   subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions   
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html   

______________________________________
To subscribe, change   options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions   
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html


**************Get  the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news &  
more!(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212774565x1200812037/aol?redir=
htt
p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001)

______________________________________
To  subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions  at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html


**************Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news & 
more!(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212774565x1200812037/aol?redir=htt
p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001)

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US