VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Crawford, Gregory" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jun 2018 08:33:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (119 lines)
For anyone interested in researching slave hires, chancery causes are a
rich resource. Finding aids for chancery causes are available at
vaheritage.org. See below for some examples.

Arlington County Chancery Cause 1827-036, Administrator of William Stewart,
Jr. versus Catherine Flood McCall and others -  The cause includes
correspondence between Stewart and Archibald McCall, father and business
manager of Catherine. The correspondence mostly deals with business matters
related to a nail factory in Alexandria that Stewart managed. Slaves from
McCall's estate in Essex County were hired out to work in the factory.

Prince Edward County Chancery Cause 1811-001, Peter Nunnally, Sr. vs.
Administrator of Thomas H. Puckett - Contract Dispute. This case involves a
dispute over terms of hiring out slaves. It contains several depositions
about the practice of bidding for annual contracts for the *hire *of
slaves, and prices for hiring two enslaved boys.

Montgomery County Chancery Cause 1849-002, Joseph Deyerle, etc. vs. Adm. of
Abner Early - Estate dispute includes mention of several enslaved persons
and depositions describing several of them and estimating their value for
sale and hire . A deponent Charles Thomas estimated the cost of maintaining
Arthur, an enslaved person described as "an old blind creature." Deposition
by Jacob Bott indicates that Arthur's son was Mingo who "supported his
father." Commissioner's report includes hire amounts received and also
allowance permitted estate for keeping "old Arthur." Also records
purchasers of slaves sold and moved "west" by Nicholas Bagwell

Lynchburg Chancery Cause 1824-001, John H. Smith vs. John Labby, etc. -
Suit involves a slave named Squire, also called Squire Lacy, who was a
waterman who could navigate the James River. Plaintiff hired slave from
defendants. He accused the defendants of fraud. The defendants claimed the
slave was healthy at time of sale but the plaintiff said he suffered from
asthma and died from it a few month later. The defendant claimed that the
plaintiff hired out the slave Squire to remove rocks from the James River
for the purpose of paving the Main Street of Lynchburg. While working in
inclement weather, the slave became sick and died.





*Greg Crawford*
*Local Records Program Manager*
*Library of Virginia*
*800 East Broad Street*
*Richmond, VA 23219-8000*
*Phone: 804-692-3505*
*Email:* [log in to unmask]
Library of Virginia <http://www.lva.virginia.gov/>

Virginia Memory <http://www.virginiamemory.com/>

 Out of the Box | Notes from the Archives at The Library of Virginia
<http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box>


*"R**emember, no matter where you go, there you are.**" - Buckaroo Banzai*


On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Tarter, Brent <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> If the mill had wanted to hire skilled free men, the advertisement would
> probably have said so in those words. Generally, "negro" referred to
> enslaved people in that context. Suzanne G. Schnittman's 1987 University of
> Rochester doctoral dissertation, "Slavery in Virginia's Urban Tobacco
> Industry," clearly documents industrial hiring of enslaved laborers for
> long and short term adjustments to a labor force during the decades before
> the Civil War, including in Richmond.
>
> Brent Tarter
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Rita Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > In an 1812 ad placed in a Richmond paper, Gallego, Richard & Co. are
> > seeking a "number of good negroes" to work in their mills as well as
> "some
> > good negro coopers." Would these be free men, slaves who were hired out
> by
> > their owners or slaves that the company would buy from their owners? If
> > they were free, why would the ad specify the race and not just say
> > "workers" or "coopers"?
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Rita Goldberg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________
> > To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
> at
> > http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> >
> > This list is made possible by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Museum
> > and Library Services (IMLS).
> >
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> This list is made possible by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Museum
> and Library Services (IMLS).
>

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

This list is made possible by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US