VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Maass, John R Dr CMH" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 May 2008 06:11:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
Staples has as much proof as you do that Cocke was bad mouthing TJ over
religion.  When you come across items you don't like, you call them
lies, but you seem perfectly willing make giant leaps without firm proff
when you want to defend TJ. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Herbert Barger
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [VA-HIST] Brent Staples NYT "again" "bad mouthing" Thomas
Jefferson

I note that Brent Staples at NYT is at it again, stating that Thomas
Jefferson fathered slave children. He has NO proof of it and just seems
to go back to the earlier NYT articles when the media was believing the
Nature article. Why does he not go to the Scholar's Commission Report
(www.tjheritage.org) and read the truth about the study.....NO proof of
TJ fathering slave children? In my opinion, he needs to drag it out
again every time he writes a slavery or African American story. 

Herb Barger

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of S. Corneliussen
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] NY Times essay

For Brent Staples to presume the Hemings-TJ paternity is nothing new. He

mentions it at a rate of once per year or two or so. In my view, what he

wrote today about the Loving case, however, merits attention. It also
seems to me that what Jon Kukla contributed about General John Hartwell
Cocke may merit attention too, though I note that Cyndi Burton's book
also has some interesting things to say about that. What I, for one,
believe does not merit any bandwidth is a resumption of what Brent
Tarter recently called

"the annual shouting match about Thomas Jefferson and sex and race."
Thanks.
Steve Corneliussen 

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US