VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:15:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Anne, your 'off the wall' multi-faceted rant to Herb, and prior ones, leads 
me to address all of your points very directly, one by one, just as A.G-R 
did when she responded to Herb's questions at her book bally-hoo for 
Washington Post, and at prior times:

You are just wrong in so many ways, too many ways for me to begin to state. 
If I tried with all my powers, I could not begin to exaggerate how wrong you 
are. You can't have read any of my postings, certainly not the ones that 
just came out a week and you resonded vehemently for days after that. I have 
never said I believe I believe you. No one who has read my postings could 
ever claim that and certainly not one who read the second. I am not 
attacking you. I think you are among the greatest VA-HIST posters who ever 
lived, including your many flaws and being absolutely wrong-minded  and all. 
Period.

Neil McDonald

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anne Pemberton" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] What is the current defination of "revisionist 
history"?


> Herbert,
>

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US